Since I have had Armani, I had the same
farrier do his trims and basically had the same routine. I would schedule the
appointments and show up early and my friend (who works at the barn) and me
would work together to bring all the horses in and out for their trims and
re-sets. It worked well for both of us, plus this was helpful becauae if I ever couldn’t be
there she wouldn’t mind handling Mani for me since I always help her out with
client horses (which is part of her job).
That is until she decided to switch
farriers before our last trim. She had asked this other guy what she thought of
one of her horses’ feet (a TB with stereotypical bad TB feet) and he basically
said they needed to fix them right away. I’m not going to get into the details
of that decision. For me it came down to logistics – it was easier if we both
used the same farrier. This “new” guy was very experienced
and did a lot of horses at our barn, so it didn’t seem like a big risk.
Even still, I agonized over the decision. If there was one word I would use to
describe how I like all things horse-related it would be consistency.
Consistency in training, conditioning, and care. I made the switch anyway.
At first I thought his feet looked
great. They looked a lot smaller than before but he still had a wonkin’ big
hoof. They also did the nicest bevel on the edges. It looked fancy! But (and you knew this was coming), for the
last 4 weeks, Armani has been ouchy on gravel for the first time since I’ve
owned him. So is my friend’s barefoot horse (not the TB) and a number of other
horses at the barn. So, it was back to agonizing about what to do.
Granted, I’m sure if I stuck it out I
could talk to this guy and get Mani back where he was. At the end of the day, I
never had a problem with the work before the switch, so that should tell me
what the best thing to do is.
Therein lies the rub. Of course I knew
there was a chance he could refuse to take me back as a client but I didn’t
really think that would happen since I only had one trim done by someone else,
I told him it was only logistics, and he said no hard feelings. Haha, right.
He is, quite understandably, reluctant
to take back a client that might just keep switching. He doesn’t know me all
that well yet, so he can’t know that I’m not like that unless I had big issues
with the work in which case I wouldn’t use that farrier again period. In the
end, he agreed to be my farrier again.
This whole situation got me thinking
about how funny the horse world is. Imagine if you went to a different grocery
store one day and the next time you went to your regular place, they shut the
door and said they don’t want your business? Ok, I realize this isn’t the same
thing but the principle isn’t that different. What about your hair stylist? Or massage
therapist? It just seems odd that someone who relies on clients would deny a
client simply because they went somewhere else once.
I could understand if we were bad clients such that anyone
would be right to deny their business. In the horse world, it seems the service
providers (trainers, farriers, etc) are the ones who call the shots, not the
ones who are paying the bills. The idea of customer service is a bit backwards;
at least that’s how it seems to me sometimes. A major factor in our economy is
competition. I tried out the competition, liked my previous provider better, and
went back. Isn’t that a sign of success? In fact, isn’t that better than if I
just ignorantly chose one person and stuck with it only because I didn’t know
any better?
Interesting questions, to me anyway.
Have you had experience with this kind of thing (horse-world or otherwise)?
Looking forward to having my rock-cruncher back.
